Non-monolithic explanatory principles in phonology |
|
Miren Lourdes Oñederra (University of the
Basque Country) |
General topic
This paper touches upon highly theoretical issues such
as whether or not universal preferences can or cannot be ignored depending on
particular data of specific languages. Contradictory sets of principles will be
said to be necessary if explanation is our ultimate goal in phonology.
Motivation for both simple and complex syllable structure, scarce and highly
developed phoneme inventories, perceptually salient and weakening
substitutions, articulatorily easy and difficult configurations will be
mentioned, the clue being that in phonology only the single process can in each
case be liable to (phonetic) explanation.
Specific study
The need for explanation in Natural Phonology and the
essential role of phonetic motivation within that framework will be taken as
the basis for the ontological separateness between phonology and morphology in
the analysis of sound substitutions. This paper shows the great advantage of
such a theory for the study of Basque expressive palatalization, which proves
to be problematic from the point of view of other theories, unless no
explanation is aimed at. Basque expressive palatalization will be shown to be a
morpho(no)logical rule and compared to other rules of Basque and other
languages. An ongoing study of the subject of Basque palatalization from the
point of view of OT will be taken into account as a reference and for the sake
of contrast. Empirical data will be drawn from our latest fieldwork (1/UPV/EHU
00033.130-HA-8025/2000) led under the auspices of the Univ. of the Basque
Country in the French Basque provinces.
First references
Donegan, Patricia. 2001. Constraints and processes in
phonological perception. Constraints and Preferences. Berlin/New York: Mouton
de Gruyter, 43-68.
Donegan, Patricia Jane and David Stampe. 1979. The
Study of Natural Phonology. Current Approaches to Phonological Theory. Daniel A. Dinnsen, ed. Bloomington: IUP. 126-173.
Hall, T. A. 2002. Against extrasyllabic consonants in
German and English.
Phonology 19,
33-75.